The Armchair Economist
Preface to the Second Edition
One day in 1991, I walked into a medium sized bookstore and counted over
80 titles on quantum physics and the
history of the Universe. A few shelves
over I found Richard Dawkins's bestseller The
Selfish Gene along with dozens of others explaining Darwinan
evolution and the genetic code.
In the best of these books, I discovered natural
wonders, confronted mysteries, learned new ways
of thinking, and felt I
had shared in a great intellectual adventure,
founded on ideas that are dazzling in their scope and
their simplicity.
Economics, too, is a great intellectual adventure, but I could find, in
1991, not a single book that proposed to share that adventure with the
general public.
There was nothing that revealed the
economist's unique way of thinking, using a few simple
ideas to illuminate the whole range of human behavior,
shake up our preconceptions, and jolt us into new ways
of seeing the world.
I resolved to write that book.
The Armchair
Economist was published in 1993, and attracted a
large and devoted following. In the intervening
20 years, it has earned much high praise. But what
I take most pride in is that
The Armchair
Economist is still widely recognized among
economists as the book to give your mother when she
wants to understand what you do all day.
A lot has changed in that 20 years. Today, no bookstore patron could
complain about a paucity of titles in the
popular economics section. Some of the new titles are
quite good. Several, I daresay, were inspired
by Armchair.
The most well-known of the recent titles is Levitt and
Dubner's Freakonomics, which I think is a
rollicking good read (and I said so when I reviewed it
for the Wall Street Journal). But for all its
merits, Freakonomics is more a collection of
wonderful and enlightening
anecdotes than a guide to understanding
economics. Freakonomics is out to
dazzle you with facts; The Armchair Economist is out to dazzle
you with logic.
Logic matters. It leads us from simple ideas to
surprising conclusions. A simple idea is that people
respond to incentives. A surprising conclusion
is that when drivers are protected by air bags, they
drive more recklessly and have more accidents. A simple idea is that
when the price of something goes down,
suppliers provide less of it. A surprising conclusion
is that recycling programs, which reduce the price of
timber, ensure that fewer trees are planted and forests shrink. A
simple idea is that monopolists charge
whatever price the market will bear for their output. A surprising
conclusion is that when oil supplies
are interrupted, steep price hikes
are evidence of competition,
not monopoly. A monopoly oil company wouldn't wait
for a supply interruption to raise the price.
Evidence matters too, but logic can be powerful all on
its own. Take, for example, the argument about
recycling and the size of forests. If I wrote that the reason we have
large cattle herds in this country is
that people eat a lot of meat, few readers would demand detailed
numerical evidence to support that conclusion. The idea itself is too
powerful and too compelling.
It's instructive, then, to realize that the same
powerful and compelling idea tells us that one reason we have large
cultivated forests is that people use a lot
of paper. Of course, ideas can always be misleading --- but then so can
numbers. Still, we advance by learning new ways to think, even if those
ways are not
infallible. (In this particular case, if you still
insist on evidence, you might start at the website of
the
North Carolina Forestry Association.)
Much else has changed since 1991. When I wrote
The Armchair Economist, I envisioned a
``computer game of life,'' where nobody ever tells you
whether you won or lost. You live and you die, and if
you play well you collect rewards. If you decide it's
not worth the trouble to play well, that's fine too.
Today that game exists, and over 20 million people have played it. It's
called Second Life. In 1991, when I
wanted an example of a crazy entrepreneurial wild goose chase, I invented
a CEO who wanted to build a computer
you could carry in your pocket. Perhaps you're now
reading these words on that computer.
There's also much that hasn't changed. The basic
principles of economics continue to surprise, delight
and edify, and they're much the same as they were in
1991, though there are always new applications.
In updating The Armchair Economist for the 21st century, I've
culled the Internet, the media, and
my own experience of life for good contemporary
applications of the eternal ideas of economic theory.
As a result, some chapters --- those where the examples were starting to
seem a little musty --- have been
almost entirely rewritten. Others have been updated to put more emphasis
on today's concerns. I've
excised all references to cassette tapes, Polaroid film
and Walter Mondale.
This edition has also benefited enormously from the
critical eye of Lisa Talpey, who read multiple drafts
of every chapter and wouldn't let me stop revising
until I'd met her extremely high standards for clarity.
Until Lisa got her hands on this manuscript, I'd had
no idea how much room there was for improvement.
One other thing has changed since 1991: The
world has become a more ideological place. Nowadays,
it's almost impossible to explain a non-controversial
bit of economic reasoning without being suspected of
some ulterior ideological agenda. So let me be upfront about this: I do
have opinions. Speaking very broadly, I tend to be optimistic about the
power of markets to do good, and skeptical of the power of governments to
do
better. And I am sure there's an occasional passage in this book where
I've failed to restrain myself from
betraying those prejudices. But this book is not a work of ideology. It
is, with rare exceptions, about the basic principles that guide the work
of almost all economists, regardless of where they lie on the political
spectrum. There is some disagreement among economists about which of
these ideas are most important, but very little
disagreement that they are basically correct.
Economists from the far left to the far right have
praised The Armchair Economist for its accurate portrayal of the
ideas we all have in common, and in
this new edition I've aimed to continue deserving that
praise.
|